<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Content Kill the Web?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content</link>
	<description>Copywriting, Web Design, WordPress Customization - Men with Pens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:26:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Could FaceBook Ban You or Your Business? : SuperWAHM, Expert Business Planning for work at home moms</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-32257</link>
		<dc:creator>Could FaceBook Ban You or Your Business? : SuperWAHM, Expert Business Planning for work at home moms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-32257</guid>
		<description>[...] went searching on Google for “how to use FaceBook for business”. That was a mistake. If I hated PLR before, I hate it even more now. I had to skim through what felt like thousands of almost identical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] went searching on Google for “how to use FaceBook for business”. That was a mistake. If I hated PLR before, I hate it even more now. I had to skim through what felt like thousands of almost identical [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-29813</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-29813</guid>
		<description>@ Lode - Well, no, I&#039;m usually not afraid to call it as it is... thank goodness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Lode &#8211; Well, no, I&#8217;m usually not afraid to call it as it is&#8230; thank goodness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lode M. Loyens</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-29812</link>
		<dc:creator>Lode M. Loyens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-29812</guid>
		<description>Finally!  Someone who&#039;s not afraid to say it.  PLRs are indeed overrated and especially overused.  The strength of article marketing is in the content: UNIQUE content that is.  Having 5000 of the same articles floating all over the net isn&#039;t unique ...!

And even when taking the trouble to rewrite the PLR articles (and if you do why not just write the darn thing from scratch?); the &quot;modified&quot; result far too often still bares too close a resemblance to the original article.

PLRs ... only good for the seller, not the buyer.  BTW; these aren&#039;t the only &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidersinternetmarketing.com/TWL&quot;&gt;&quot;legal scams&quot;&lt;/a&gt; internet marketers get suckered into...
.-= Lode M. Loyens&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetMarketingSimplified/~3/Nz4WwARPvVE/&quot;&gt;Affiliate Marketing: Do It Right â€“ Part 4&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally!  Someone who&#8217;s not afraid to say it.  PLRs are indeed overrated and especially overused.  The strength of article marketing is in the content: UNIQUE content that is.  Having 5000 of the same articles floating all over the net isn&#8217;t unique &#8230;!</p>
<p>And even when taking the trouble to rewrite the PLR articles (and if you do why not just write the darn thing from scratch?); the &#8220;modified&#8221; result far too often still bares too close a resemblance to the original article.</p>
<p>PLRs &#8230; only good for the seller, not the buyer.  BTW; these aren&#8217;t the only <a href="http://www.insidersinternetmarketing.com/TWL">&#8220;legal scams&#8221;</a> internet marketers get suckered into&#8230;<br />
<span class="cluv"> Lode M. Loyens&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InternetMarketingSimplified/~3/Nz4WwARPvVE/">Affiliate Marketing: Do It Right â€“ Part 4</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://menwithpens.ca/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thesis writing</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-28245</link>
		<dc:creator>thesis writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-28245</guid>
		<description>Extremely long but very useful and informative article. How i wish i can do all of that in a short period of time. But for sure doing those will produce results. I will try to spread your words through my blog and link it back to you. Thanks a lot for those tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely long but very useful and informative article. How i wish i can do all of that in a short period of time. But for sure doing those will produce results. I will try to spread your words through my blog and link it back to you. Thanks a lot for those tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inkthinker &#124; Freelance Writing &#38; Communications Blog &#187; The PLR Controversy Continues&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-22150</link>
		<dc:creator>Inkthinker &#124; Freelance Writing &#38; Communications Blog &#187; The PLR Controversy Continues&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-22150</guid>
		<description>[...] And here are some blog posts inspired by the remarks we&#8217;ve seen so far: Will Content Kill the Web? The Web is on a crash course for disaster. Thereâ€™s a glut of content out there, with more added daily in phenomenal amounts. The information is repetitive and redundant. The churned-out content that fills up the Internet is making it hard for people to sort out the good and the accurate from the ugly. Read more &gt;&gt;&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] And here are some blog posts inspired by the remarks we&#8217;ve seen so far: Will Content Kill the Web? The Web is on a crash course for disaster. Thereâ€™s a glut of content out there, with more added daily in phenomenal amounts. The information is repetitive and redundant. The churned-out content that fills up the Internet is making it hard for people to sort out the good and the accurate from the ugly. Read more &gt;&gt;&gt; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Men With Pens Review</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-3403</link>
		<dc:creator>Men With Pens Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-3403</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Content Kill the Web?  PLR content drives down the market value of web content. Why buy pricier work when nearly-free (and sometimes free) is right there for the taking? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Will Content Kill the Web?  PLR content drives down the market value of web content. Why buy pricier work when nearly-free (and sometimes free) is right there for the taking? [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>@ Blogginess - I&#039;ve been reading and rereading this comment since you submitted it. I think you&#039;re right on many accounts - that PLR hurts a business more than it does good, that content spinners suck, that there&#039;s no excuse not to invest in content when all it costs to have a website is $20 a month at the very most... that if you&#039;re a good writer, PLR just isn&#039;t your market and that yes, most cheapie articles are absolute crap. Tons of truth there.

There are some good writers who don&#039;t know any better. There are cheap articles that are good - but not of magazine quality by any means.  And yes - writers doing PLR should look to other alternatives. No insult meant to the good writers, as always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Blogginess &#8211; I&#8217;ve been reading and rereading this comment since you submitted it. I think you&#8217;re right on many accounts &#8211; that PLR hurts a business more than it does good, that content spinners suck, that there&#8217;s no excuse not to invest in content when all it costs to have a website is $20 a month at the very most&#8230; that if you&#8217;re a good writer, PLR just isn&#8217;t your market and that yes, most cheapie articles are absolute crap. Tons of truth there.</p>
<p>There are some good writers who don&#8217;t know any better. There are cheap articles that are good &#8211; but not of magazine quality by any means.  And yes &#8211; writers doing PLR should look to other alternatives. No insult meant to the good writers, as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Her Blogginess</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-3019</link>
		<dc:creator>Her Blogginess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-3019</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my question... how are these people who buy and use PLR content making any money? Sooner or later, the search engines are going to find ways to filter that crap right out. I can think of an easy way off the top of my head, when they crawl content, they can simply crawl it for words. If the same combinations of words (over 30+  or so) are found in duplicate form in other places, then the site&#039;s ranking is lowered off the charts.. bam! Just like that, content spinners and PLR become obsolete. Content spinners can mash the words up, but they don&#039;t make it original, it&#039;s still the same words over and over again. That is a weakness that search engines can exploit.

I think the main problem is that because the Internet is has such a low cost point of entry, people who paid $10 bucks for a domain and pay say $10 a month for hosting just can&#039;t afford to pay for decent content, so they turn to the dregs of writers who will sell crap writing for a couple of bucks. I doubt these people ever actually make any real money, so I would say that eventually the cycle of cheap content will just burn itself out. Cheap writers cannot write to the standards that a well paying publication requires anyway. I work as an editor for some of these low cost cheapie articles, and I am telling you, the quality is absolute crap. 

For a good writer, the issue isn&#039;t even worth worrying about. Writers who write for a couple of bucks aren&#039;t your competition, and gigs that offer a few dollars in payment aren&#039;t your market.

If you are writing in these circumstances, perhaps it is time to take an honest look at your skills and qualifications. The internet is filled with WAHMs, non English speakers, and generally unqualified people who think that writing is an easy way to make a few bucks on the side. It is, but that will literally be just a few bucks, and they are not good writers. (Most of them, that is - i do not mean to insult well trained, educated and practiced WAHMs, just the ones who suddenly decide that they are writers because they can put one word after another.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my question&#8230; how are these people who buy and use PLR content making any money? Sooner or later, the search engines are going to find ways to filter that crap right out. I can think of an easy way off the top of my head, when they crawl content, they can simply crawl it for words. If the same combinations of words (over 30+  or so) are found in duplicate form in other places, then the site&#8217;s ranking is lowered off the charts.. bam! Just like that, content spinners and PLR become obsolete. Content spinners can mash the words up, but they don&#8217;t make it original, it&#8217;s still the same words over and over again. That is a weakness that search engines can exploit.</p>
<p>I think the main problem is that because the Internet is has such a low cost point of entry, people who paid $10 bucks for a domain and pay say $10 a month for hosting just can&#8217;t afford to pay for decent content, so they turn to the dregs of writers who will sell crap writing for a couple of bucks. I doubt these people ever actually make any real money, so I would say that eventually the cycle of cheap content will just burn itself out. Cheap writers cannot write to the standards that a well paying publication requires anyway. I work as an editor for some of these low cost cheapie articles, and I am telling you, the quality is absolute crap. </p>
<p>For a good writer, the issue isn&#8217;t even worth worrying about. Writers who write for a couple of bucks aren&#8217;t your competition, and gigs that offer a few dollars in payment aren&#8217;t your market.</p>
<p>If you are writing in these circumstances, perhaps it is time to take an honest look at your skills and qualifications. The internet is filled with WAHMs, non English speakers, and generally unqualified people who think that writing is an easy way to make a few bucks on the side. It is, but that will literally be just a few bucks, and they are not good writers. (Most of them, that is &#8211; i do not mean to insult well trained, educated and practiced WAHMs, just the ones who suddenly decide that they are writers because they can put one word after another.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelance Writing Jobs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekend Link Love</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelance Writing Jobs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekend Link Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Content Kill the Web at Men with Pens. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Will Content Kill the Web at Men with Pens. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content/comment-page-1#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menwithpens.ca/plr-content#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>@ RLD - Yep, my professor would definitely fail me if I did that!  Oh and thanks for the info about Google Scholar... it&#039;s already helping me find studies to use in my paper!

&lt;em&gt;Allison&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://sushiday.com/archives/2008/02/23/taste-and-create-5/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Taste and Create 5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ RLD &#8211; Yep, my professor would definitely fail me if I did that!  Oh and thanks for the info about Google Scholar&#8230; it&#8217;s already helping me find studies to use in my paper!</p>
<p><em>Allison&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://sushiday.com/archives/2008/02/23/taste-and-create-5/' rel="nofollow">Taste and Create 5</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
