20 Responses to “The Last Step Before Our Move”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Brett Legree

    Is this, perhaps, the sneak peek of the theme? If so, very nice indeed – good work, gentlemen! If not, well, still very nice.

  2. Not even close, Brad ;) But yes, this is a nicer theme, isn’t it? I think I’m going to tell Harry to just change the banner and leave it like this.

  3. Brett Legree

    :) well, then if this is not the sneak peek, I can hardly wait to see what you guys really have in store!

  4. Oooh! How exciting. I can hardly wait.

  5. Sneak peak.

    That’s my vote.

    Looking forward to it guys.

  6. Whoa! Have fun guys. What a mess. Does look like moving day with all the boxes scattered around. Do you want me to help haul a box to your new place? E

  7. You guys *are* keeping this blog up even after you move to the other one, right? It would be a shame to lose the incoming links …

  8. Harry

    @Brett: This was the closest available theme I had on hand. Another of Brian Gardner’s. After I put it up, I thought, “Hmmm, this doesn’t look half bad…betcha James wants to keep it…”

    @Sharon/Jay: Only a few more days, no sneak peaks!

    @Ellen: Yeah, grab that box over there and make sure the oven’s turned off on your way out, would you? Thanks.

    @Dave: After much deliberation, we have decided to keep this blog open. There’s a few things we don’t want to lose and the incoming links are one of them :)

    Besides, I have a series to finish.

  9. Is there a way to redirect your feed so that it routes to the new blog? That way your current subscribers could simply receive your new posts (since you won’t be blogging at this site).

  10. @ Dave – That’s a very good question, and I don’t know the answer. Anyone? Is that possible?

  11. If you go into feedburner and replace your old feed URL with the new one (and change the feed’s title text), that would do it … but you’d have to leave your feedburner URL (http://feeds.feedburner.com/jcme) the same. I think that’s reasonable, since the acronym doesn’t reveal a conflicting brand.

    In other words, if I went to your new blog but saw the feed URL was http://feeds.feedburner.com/WebContentWriterTips, it would look conflicty, but JCME is vague enough to be passable.

    Make sense?

  12. That makes very much sense. I didn’t even think of that. Consider it done.

    But wait… Are you saying we’re vague?

  13. Brett Legree

    @Harry: ah, that explains it then (his work is very sharp, in my non-expert opinion)

    I am looking forward to the rest of that series, by the way – very good so far.

  14. I am ready for the sneak peek! You guys are SUCH teasers!

  15. Tsk, tsk, tsk… patience, patience… Good things come to those who wait ;)

  16. Harry

    @Brett: Brian’s work is sharp, no doubt about it.
    @Melissa: I was just about to suggest throwing some flattery in James’ direction to get a sneak peek, but the King has spoken. Guess you’ll have to spend the weekend on the edge of your seat. :)

  17. Whoa! Big news…still keeping the JCME name?

  18. We do have to keep the JCME name, because that’s the registered name of the business – however, we won’t be publicizing that too much. The domain name is changing completely and we’ll be running under a new name as a division of JCME.

    A much better name :)

  19. Ha! Vague?! With all these boxes around? There’s nothing definitive! I’ve got the meatloaf and will help you unpack (no, it’s not a funeral), well, maybe it is…but, Harry has some series?

  20. @ Ellen – Harry does series, yup. He tends to have better focus for that, and his series did really well. The latest is the way of writing, and he isn’t quite finished it.

    The last was the 7 deadly fears of writing, which was very cool because he explored his own fears in each of the eight posts.

    Can I pass on the meatloaf? Do we have pasta? And some Coke, maybe?

Go ahead. Leave a Comment!

CommentLuv Enabled